Edge radii are also something of an unknown - they don't pnotograph well because they're small and the highlights cause some unwanted bloom. As I said, the biggest problem is getting the unserside curves, and the base of the diffuser. The real test will be the reflective renders. I've got enough pictures of most of the car aligning points to multiple perspectives (triangulation) can be extremely accurate, providing the pictures are good enough. With the UV test plane applied is looks like a Bennetton.

But, as I said, the exact profile is unknown if I only know the front, top, back and one point on the bottom.ĮDIT: Halfway through unwrapping. Of course, it's definitely possible to work out the lower extremities of the wing, and the curve will fall within it and between the leading and trailing edges, and it will be as smooth as the material allows (and there are enough pics for that). Apart from modeling what the 'logical' shape, I'm blind. I've got no visuals, so I can't be certain.

I can work out the curve on the top easily enough, and it'll be damn accurate. The biggest problem for accuracy is the underside wing profiles. My model was based on the pictures available here, looking for StefanGP TF110 should return the results (the red car in the workshop provided references for the front, side, and rear wing.Īs far as accuracy goes, once I'm done unwrapping I'll post some overlays with the real pictures.

Toyota tf110 download